The Unified Pension Scheme 2024 indeed promises to offer a new horizon for government employees as far as their pensions are concerned. It will replace the existing National Pension System at present operating for government employees with something much improved, hence promising to provide a stable and predictable retirement option. This article seeks to explore some of the key differences between the UPS and NPS approaches in terms of handling retirement needs for government employees.
This major decision under the Unified Pension Scheme is going to lay down a system of retirement benefits more secure to government employees. Assured benefits and freedom from the submission of the continuously demanded sum of contributions might make the unified pension scheme more attractive to those individuals wanting assured benefits. The choice between the two schemes will be a personal matter; it will depend on the individual’s taste towards taking risks or seeking security.
Contents
UPS. Vs NPS. Which is better?
United Pension Scheme: This was born out of the urge or demands of a much better pension system, which is the only purpose for something to be assured to government employees in a way that subscribes to a fixed percentage of the last-drawn salary. The scheme will come into effect on 1st April 2025 and shall apply mainly to the employees working in the Central government.
National Pension System: A market-based, defined contribution pension system introduced by the Centre in 2004. Money contributed by an employee and the government toward a pension fund is then invested in equities and government bonds. The amount finally drawn from the system decides the pension being drawn upon them.
Base Difference Between UPS and NPS
1. Benefits and Pension Calculation
For instance, UPS has already provided a 50% pension of average basic pay drawn for the last 12 months prior to retirement; and this factor is then translated into an explicitly defined benefit scheme, so that the pension amount is already predefined and is not affected by market vagaries. Employees with more than 25 years of service are given further increases in their pension commensurate with price rise.
NPS is defined as contribution-based, and no quantum of pension is guaranteed. This pension, based on the corpus built up at the retirement age, will be dependent upon the returns generated by the investments made through the NPS. This, therefore, brings a great degree of uncertainty in the fact that the ultimate quantum of pension might differ greatly as a factor of the market conditions ruling during the time of retirement.
2. Employee Contributions
The one obvious advantage of UPS is the non-contribution that the employee supports. This is in stark contrast to NPS, where he has to contribute 10% of his basic salary equally so that he may, in the long run, be eligible to pay into a pension along with a 14% of a government’s basic pay.
NPS: Employee’s contribution is mandatory under the NPS and gets lumped together with that of the government in determining the amount relating to pension. It will, therefore, be some kind of scheme that grows with the contribution made over the years and the yield thereon to decide the quantum to be saved.
3. Market Risk and Dependency
Predictability in the fixed amount of retirement income under UPS, since it does not depend upon the fortunes of the market. This, therefore, ensures that the employees are consoled and assured of a smooth and non-variable post-retirement period.
Market-linked NPS exposes it to market risk. While this might help get higher returns, it could equally lead to the risk of pension income coming in lower than expected and estimates, particularly in times when the performance of markets is bad. Annuity purchased at retirement with the corpus earned under NPS varies with the interest rates.
4. Sufficiency and Coverage
The UPS could be able to achieve this through the use of government employees who, at the time of hire, had spent at least 25 years in their services. UPS is more long-time-oriented because it attaches retirement income security for the employee.
NPS On the other hand is available to all government workers who entered service post 1st April 2004 and, besides not being available to private sector employees or the self employed, it is thus available in a more flexible option where coverage is concerned.
- Ladli Behna Yojana 2024: Apply Online, Status, Beneficiary List Released
- IBPS RRB Clerk Result 2024: Prelims Scorecard Office Assistant @ibps.in
- $200 Hike + $2000 4th Stimulus Check September: Eligibility, Payout Date
- PhonePe Personal Loan 2024:5 लाख का लोन सिर्फ 5 मिनट में, बिना किसी दस्तावेज़ के
- Zero CIBIL Score Loan 2024:कितना भी कम हो सिबिल स्कोर फिर भी मिलेगा इंस्टेंट लोन सीधा बैंक में
5. Post-retirement Benefits UPS
It releases 60% of the pension amount under Pension for Family in case of an accidental death. It added that provisions have been made for pensioning at par with cost of living with indexation provisions and other similar measures. It also guaranteed a minimum family pension of ₹10,000 for all the terms served above 10 years.
NPS- there is a provision for withdrawal of 60% of the corpus accrued at retirement, but 40% has to compulsorily be invested in annuity as per statute for regular pension. While this does introduce one element of flexibility, no certain pension promise can really convince the mind designing a quantum of postretirement certainty about income.
People Also Ask FAQ’s::
Beyond that, the variance lies in the parameter of pension benefit, whereby UPS assures someone that he is invariably going to experience an increase in his pension based on the last-drawn salary. There is a variance in what performance-based pension means under NPS.
UPS, with benefits “promised” to workers, are considered better for long-term security and a source of predictable income after retirement. It has to give better returns with the National Pension Scheme but comes with market risks.
UPS is mainly made applicable to the central government employees; however, NPS applies to both the government and private sector employees equally.
While the latter is supposed to replace the former for future government employees, not a word has come out so far on whether existing NPS subscribers will have an option to switch over.